| Roni Natov, The Poetics of Childhood. New York and London: Routledge, 2002. ISBN 0-8153-3882-1 Review
by Lydia Kokkola, Turku University, Finland The Poetics of Childhood investigates the highly topical subject of the experience and representation of childhood. The texts examined are wide-ranging as Natov winds a path from late eighteenth century Romanticism to twentieth century literature for both adults and children pausing only briefly at the end of the nineteenth century en route. Her texts range from traditional fairy tales to postmodern novels, including picturebooks, life writing and poetry. In brief, despite its Anglo-American focus, this is an ambitious study in terms of both its aims and its subject matter. In the hands of a lesser scholar, the result might well be superficial. Natov's command of the topic, however, is impressive, erudite and honest. The introduction situates childhood as a space within both individual minds and the collective consciousness of a society. Natov provides an overview of various schools of thought on the poetics of childhood. Whilst the contents imply little new will be offered to well read scholars of children's literature, readers of all backgrounds will undoubtedly be touched by Natov's ability to write. As she shifts between autobiographical criticism, summary and evaluation, she is clear, direct and playful. Her discussions of canonized texts cast familiar ideas in a new light, as she makes connections between texts, the history of ideas and psychology. Ultimately, The Poetics of Childhood is far more original than its introduction suggests. The
chapters are arranged in roughly the order in which
the investigated texts were published. In this way,
she maps the sites of various views of childhood onto
their sociocultural contexts. The notion of the child
as monster is mentioned briefly and then dismissed as
she turns to dwell on the Romantic child. Alternative
views of childhood are measured by their distance from
this point. Within this broad framework, she examines
varieties of pastoral - the dark pastoral and the antipastoral
- as ways of acknowledging the less positive aspects
of childhood. Natov divides her investigation of childhood as pastoral into three sections. The traditional view is developed in her chapter on the green world, which is regarded as "a response to the worldliness of the world" (91). This response is not escapist but expresses "the longing for a return to an earlier state, real or imagined" (ibid.). Again, Natov shows how childhood serves adults' needs as "the child actually can serve as the green world itself" (92). Indeed, all the texts investigated in this chapter seem more suggestive of the adults' needs than a reflection of felt experience. The dark pastoral may be more expressive of actual experience, albeit represented in idealised literary form. The dark pastoral suggests a time of terror which is essential to maturation. By entering the dark wood, the child enters the liminal space between childhood and adulthood. Identifying with either position results in danger and loss. It is a space for growth, but a space that is situated away from the safety of the green world. Time spent in the dark wood is not pleasant, but it enables transformation, and is therefore ultimately optimistic in outlook. By way of contrast, the antipastoral rejects the possibility of pastoral. It denies childhood fears and dislocates the world of childhood from adulthood. Its desolate landscape is softened by ironic humour, but the outlook of these texts is bleak. Whilst
Natov's treatments of each individual author, poet or
specific text is detailed, rigorous and innovative,
the sheer breadth of her material occasionally leaves
the reader groping for coherence. For instance, her
penultimate chapter, enticingly titled "The Contemporary
Child in Adult Literature" discusses only two novels:
The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy and
Barbara Kingsolver's The Poisonwood Bible. Her
analyses are deeply insightful and thorough. However,
she does not explain why she chose these two particular
texts, nor does she draw wider generalisations about
depictions of the contemporary child in adult literature
beyond the obvious statement that they "represent
childhood as a way of seeing the world - freshly, and
viewed almost from outside" (191). Some readers
will naturally find such openness for individual interpretation
within the text a positive feature. I, however, longed
for clearer statements of Natov's views at this point. The
Poetics of Childhood is likely to become one
of those essential reference books all scholars of children's
literature and the literature of childhood will need
to have on their shelves. Natov challenges each of us
to articulate our understanding of childhood more precisely,
and she has provided a vocabulary and framework to assist
us in our debate. She has presented us with a map and
compass, the choice of direction is ours. Lydia Kokkola |